Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 68 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Protein | 11.4 g ★ | 2.01 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 467% more |
| Carbs | 0.14 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Fat | 2.38 g | 0.15 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 1487% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 119 mg | 36 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 231% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, testes, raw has 65% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 265 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.