Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 225 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw has 88% more |
| Protein | 14.27 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw has 224% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 18.61 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw has 869% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw has 1000% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 1.25 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 16% more |
| Potassium | 207 mg ★ | 172 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tongue - swiss cut, raw has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.