McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 81 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Protein | 10.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken has 411% more |
| Carbs | 3.64 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 3.14 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken has 1993% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 1.73 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sodium | 230 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken has 539% more |
| Calcium | 48 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, Bacon Ranch Salad with Grilled Chicken has 26% more |
| Iron | 0.65 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Vitamin C | 10.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.