McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 302 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS has 236% more |
| Protein | 15.79 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS has 686% more |
| Carbs | 15.09 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Fat | 19.81 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS has 13107% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.08 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Sodium | 566 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS has 1472% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, Chicken McNUGGETS has 29% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 252 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.