McDONALD'S, Hash Brown vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Hash Brown
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown has 201% more |
| Protein | 2.48 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown has 23% more |
| Carbs | 28.56 g ★ | 20.71 g | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown has 38% more |
| Fat | 16.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown has 10767% more |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0.54 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Sodium | 580 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Hash Brown has 1511% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 5.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Potassium | 341 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.