McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 273 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 203% more |
| Protein | 10.43 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 419% more |
| Carbs | 27.97 g ★ | 20.71 g | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 35% more |
| Fat | 13.21 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 8707% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 3.57 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sodium | 624 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 1633% more |
| Calcium | 88 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 132% more |
| Iron | 1.74 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, McCHICKEN Sandwich has 152% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 173 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.