McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 147% more |
| Protein | 13.77 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 585% more |
| Carbs | 18.43 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
| Fat | 10.31 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 6773% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Sugar | 1.53 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sodium | 577 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 1503% more |
| Calcium | 93 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 145% more |
| Iron | 1.45 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, RANCH SNACK WRAP, Grilled has 110% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Potassium | 192 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.