McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 270% more |
| Protein | 12.66 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 530% more |
| Carbs | 24.52 g ★ | 20.71 g | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 18% more |
| Fat | 21.06 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 13940% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 1.93 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sodium | 693 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 1825% more |
| Calcium | 224 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 489% more |
| Iron | 2.04 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, Sausage McMUFFIN has 196% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 188 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.