McDONALD'S, Side Salad vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Side Salad
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Side Salad | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Protein | 1.03 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 77% more |
| Carbs | 4.3 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Fat | 0.19 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Sugar | 2.24 g | 0.87 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 157% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg | 7 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 71% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 17 mg | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.65 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.7 mg ★ | 0 mg | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 0% more |
| Potassium | 220 mg ★ | 172 mg | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.