McDONALD'S, Side Salad vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Side Salad
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Side Salad | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Protein | 1.03 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Carbs | 4.3 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Fat | 0.19 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Side Salad has 27% more |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Sugar | 2.24 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 0.65 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Potassium | 220 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.