McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 238% more |
| Protein | 11.93 g ★ | 2.01 g | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 494% more |
| Carbs | 30.56 g ★ | 20.71 g | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 48% more |
| Fat | 14.93 g | 0.15 g ★ | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 9853% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 2.62 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
| Sodium | 868 mg | 36 mg ★ | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 2311% more |
| Calcium | 44 mg ★ | 38 mg | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 16% more |
| Iron | 1.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | McDONALD'S, Southern Style Chicken Biscuit has 155% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 206 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.