Meat extender vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Meat extender
8 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
1 wins
| Nutrient | Meat extender | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Meat extender has 103% more |
| Protein | 41.71 g ★ | 24.58 g | Meat extender has 70% more |
| Carbs | 34.71 g ★ | 0 g | Meat extender has 0% more |
| Fat | 2.97 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 44% more |
| Fiber | 17.5 g ★ | 0 g | Meat extender has 0% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 89% more |
| Calcium | 204 mg ★ | 8 mg | Meat extender has 2450% more |
| Iron | 11.99 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Meat extender has 2564% more |
| Potassium | 1902 mg ★ | 439 mg | Meat extender has 333% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.