Mulberries, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Mulberries, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Mulberries, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 43 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Protein | 1.44 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Carbs | 9.8 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Fat | 0.39 g | 0.15 g ★ | Mulberries, raw has 160% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 8.1 g | 6.48 g ★ | Mulberries, raw has 25% more |
| Sodium | 10 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Calcium | 39 mg ★ | 38 mg | Mulberries, raw has 3% more |
| Iron | 1.85 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Mulberries, raw has 168% more |
| Vitamin C | 36.4 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Mulberries, raw has 86% more |
| Potassium | 194 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.