Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 195% more |
| Protein | 12.32 g ★ | 4.4 g | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 180% more |
| Carbs | 72.2 g ★ | 21.3 g | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 239% more |
| Fat | 1.78 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Sugar | 4.95 g | 0.87 g ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 469% more |
| Sodium | 1537 mg | 7 mg ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 21857% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg ★ | 17 mg | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 24% more |
| Iron | 2.71 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 82% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 0% more |
| Potassium | 342 mg ★ | 172 mg | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 99% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.