Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 354 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 293% more |
| Protein | 12.32 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 513% more |
| Carbs | 72.2 g ★ | 20.71 g | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 249% more |
| Fat | 1.78 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 1087% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 4.95 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Sodium | 1537 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 4169% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Iron | 2.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pasta mix, classic beef, unprepared has 293% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Potassium | 342 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.