Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 189% more |
| Protein | 3.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 74% more |
| Carbs | 29.6 g ★ | 20.71 g | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 43% more |
| Fat | 15.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 10167% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 460 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 1178% more |
| Calcium | 77 mg ★ | 38 mg | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 103% more |
| Iron | 1.08 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pie, chocolate mousse, prepared from mix, no-bake type has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 285 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.