Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 260 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 189% more |
| Protein | 5.9 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 194% more |
| Carbs | 30.2 g ★ | 20.71 g | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 46% more |
| Fat | 13.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 8700% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 335 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 831% more |
| Calcium | 81 mg ★ | 38 mg | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 113% more |
| Iron | 0.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pie, coconut custard, commercially prepared has 16% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 175 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.