Plums, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Plums, raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Plums, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 46 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Carbs | 11.42 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Fat | 0.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Plums, raw has 87% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 9.92 g | 6.48 g ★ | Plums, raw has 53% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 0.17 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
| Vitamin C | 9.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Potassium | 157 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.