Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 218 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw has 142% more |
| Protein | 17.99 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw has 795% more |
| Carbs | 0.44 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Fat | 16 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw has 10567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw has 89% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 0.88 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, ground, 84% lean / 16% fat, raw has 28% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 244 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.