Pork, oriental style, dehydrated vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, oriental style, dehydrated
4 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 615 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 908% more |
| Protein | 11.8 g ★ | 3.15 g | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 275% more |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 71% more |
| Fat | 62.4 g | 3.25 g ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 1820% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 685 mg | 43 mg ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 1493% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 91% more |
| Iron | 0.5 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 1567% more |
| Potassium | 139 mg ★ | 132 mg | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.