Pork, oriental style, dehydrated vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, oriental style, dehydrated
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 615 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 413% more |
| Protein | 11.8 g ★ | 4.4 g | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 168% more |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 93% more |
| Fat | 62.4 g | 1.92 g ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 3150% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 685 mg | 7 mg ★ | Pork, oriental style, dehydrated has 9686% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.5 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
| Potassium | 139 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.