Pummelo, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pummelo, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Pummelo, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 38 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Protein | 0.76 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Carbs | 9.62 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Fat | 0.04 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.11 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Vitamin C | 61 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Pummelo, raw has 211% more |
| Potassium | 216 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.