Refried beans, canned, traditional style vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Refried beans, canned, traditional style
7 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Refried beans, canned, traditional style | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 41% more |
| Protein | 4.98 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 80% more |
| Carbs | 13.55 g ★ | 0 g | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 0% more |
| Fat | 2.01 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 62% more |
| Fiber | 3.7 g ★ | 0 g | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 0% more |
| Sugar | 0.54 g | 0 g ★ | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 0% more |
| Sodium | 370 mg | 90 mg ★ | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 311% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg ★ | 8 mg | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 263% more |
| Iron | 1.44 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 220% more |
| Vitamin C | 6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Refried beans, canned, traditional style has 0% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.