Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken
5 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 52% more |
| Protein | 10.1 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 67% more |
| Carbs | 23.86 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Fat | 12.65 g | 3.57 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 254% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Sugar | 11.47 g | 0 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Sodium | 246 mg | 74 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 232% more |
| Calcium | 45 mg ★ | 15 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 200% more |
| Iron | 2.12 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 104% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour chicken has 0% more |
| Potassium | 158 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.