Rutabagas, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rutabagas, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Rutabagas, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 30 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Protein | 0.93 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Carbs | 6.84 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Fat | 0.18 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rutabagas, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 20% more |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sugar | 3.95 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sodium | 254 mg | 36 mg ★ | Rutabagas, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 606% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 18.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Potassium | 216 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.