Salad dressing, bacon and tomato vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, bacon and tomato
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, bacon and tomato | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 326 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, bacon and tomato has 262% more |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Carbs | 2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Fat | 35 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, bacon and tomato has 23233% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Sodium | 905 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, bacon and tomato has 2414% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.27 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.8 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Potassium | 108 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.