Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 484 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular has 438% more |
| Protein | 1.37 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Carbs | 4.77 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Fat | 51.1 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular has 33967% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sugar | 3.48 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 46% more |
| Sodium | 642 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, commercial, regular has 1683% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Iron | 0.09 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 88 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.