Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Protein | 2.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light has 4% more |
| Carbs | 13.2 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light has 1700% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 3.6 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Sodium | 939 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light has 2508% more |
| Calcium | 68 mg ★ | 38 mg | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese dressing, light has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.14 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.