Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 99 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie has 10% more |
| Protein | 5.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie has 154% more |
| Carbs | 2.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Fat | 7.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie has 4700% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.82 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Sodium | 939 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie has 2508% more |
| Calcium | 89 mg ★ | 38 mg | Salad dressing, blue or roquefort cheese, low calorie has 134% more |
| Iron | 0.5 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Potassium | 5 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.