Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 202 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite has 124% more |
| Protein | 1.25 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 38% more |
| Carbs | 21.33 g ★ | 20.71 g | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite has 3% more |
| Fat | 12.42 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite has 8180% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 3.77 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Sodium | 1120 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite has 3011% more |
| Calcium | 40 mg ★ | 38 mg | Salad dressing, buttermilk, lite has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.69 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Equal |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 132 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.