Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 110 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 93% more |
| Carbs | 18.6 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1.92 g ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 129% more |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 96% more |
| Sugar | 16.32 g | 0.87 g ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 1776% more |
| Sodium | 1148 mg | 7 mg ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 16300% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 17 mg | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Potassium | 29 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.