Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 110 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 22% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 18.6 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 2833% more |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Sugar | 16.32 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 152% more |
| Sodium | 1148 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, caesar, low calorie has 3089% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 0.18 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 29 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.