Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 174% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 40 g ★ | 21.3 g | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 88% more |
| Fat | 20 g | 1.92 g ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 942% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 86% more |
| Sugar | 38.73 g | 0.87 g ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 4352% more |
| Sodium | 1600 mg | 7 mg ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 22757% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg ★ | 17 mg | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 112% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Potassium | 50 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.