Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 266% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 40 g ★ | 20.71 g | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 93% more |
| Fat | 20 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 13233% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sugar | 38.73 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 498% more |
| Sodium | 1600 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad Dressing, coleslaw, reduced fat has 4344% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.26 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 50 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.