Salad dressing, coleslaw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, coleslaw
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, coleslaw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 404 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, coleslaw has 349% more |
| Protein | 0.85 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Carbs | 22.4 g ★ | 20.71 g | Salad dressing, coleslaw has 8% more |
| Fat | 34.53 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, coleslaw has 22920% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 21.23 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad dressing, coleslaw has 228% more |
| Sodium | 850 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, coleslaw has 2261% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 0.33 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 35 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.