Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
Nutrient Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 459 kcal 90 kcal Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt has 410% more
Protein 0.77 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more
Carbs 15.58 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more
Fat 44.81 g 0.15 g Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt has 29773% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 15.95 g 6.48 g Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt has 146% more
Sodium 0 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Calcium 24 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more
Iron 0.8 mg 0.69 mg Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular, without salt has 16% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 67 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.