Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 419 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular has 366% more |
| Protein | 0.87 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Carbs | 18.79 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Fat | 39.07 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular has 25947% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sugar | 17.43 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular has 169% more |
| Sodium | 661 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, commercial, regular has 1736% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.32 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 108 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.