Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt has 159% more |
| Protein | 0.58 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Carbs | 29.28 g ★ | 20.71 g | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt has 41% more |
| Fat | 13.46 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt has 8873% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 28.45 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt has 339% more |
| Sodium | 30 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 17% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salad dressing, french dressing, reduced fat, without salt has 26% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.