Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 102 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat has 13% more |
| Protein | 0.39 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Carbs | 9.99 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 52% more |
| Fat | 6.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat has 4353% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 9.16 g | 6.48 g ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat has 41% more |
| Sodium | 891 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, commercial, reduced fat has 2375% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 0.25 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 90 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.