Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie has 122% more |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Fat | 20 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie has 13233% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 1.94 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sodium | 1074 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, italian dressing, reduced calorie has 2883% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 0.13 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Potassium | 33 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.