Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 564 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular has 527% more |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Fat | 61.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular has 40833% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.45 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Sodium | 1103 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, peppercorn dressing, commercial, regular has 2964% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 0.35 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Potassium | 176 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.