Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 430 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular has 378% more |
| Protein | 1.32 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 34% more |
| Carbs | 5.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Fat | 44.54 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular has 29593% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 4.69 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Sodium | 901 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, ranch dressing, regular has 2403% more |
| Calcium | 28 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 64 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.