Salad dressing, sweet and sour vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salad dressing, sweet and sour
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salad dressing, sweet and sour | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 15 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 3.7 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 43% more |
| Sodium | 208 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salad dressing, sweet and sour has 478% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 0.04 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
| Potassium | 33 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.