Sandwich spread, pork, beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sandwich spread, pork, beef
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Sandwich spread, pork, beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sandwich spread, pork, beef has 161% more |
| Protein | 7.66 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sandwich spread, pork, beef has 281% more |
| Carbs | 11.94 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Fat | 17.34 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sandwich spread, pork, beef has 11460% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1013 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sandwich spread, pork, beef has 2714% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.79 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sandwich spread, pork, beef has 14% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 110 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.