Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw has 58% more |
| Protein | 17.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw has 771% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw has 4900% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 51 mg | 36 mg ★ | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw has 42% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 4.51 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Squab, (pigeon), meat only, raw has 554% more |
| Vitamin C | 7.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.