Squash, winter, butternut, cooked, baked, without salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Squash, winter, butternut, cooked, baked, without salt
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Squash, winter, butternut, cooked, baked, without salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 40 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more
Protein 0.9 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more
Carbs 10.49 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more
Fat 0.09 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more
Fiber 3.2 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more
Sugar 1.97 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more
Sodium 4 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more
Calcium 41 mg 38 mg Squash, winter, butternut, cooked, baked, without salt has 8% more
Iron 0.6 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more
Vitamin C 15.1 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more
Potassium 284 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.