Squash, winter, hubbard, cooked, boiled, mashed, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Squash, winter, hubbard, cooked, boiled, mashed, with salt
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
Nutrient Squash, winter, hubbard, cooked, boiled, mashed, with salt Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 30 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more
Protein 1.48 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more
Carbs 6.46 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more
Fat 0.37 g 0.15 g Squash, winter, hubbard, cooked, boiled, mashed, with salt has 147% more
Fiber 2.9 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more
Sugar 2.93 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more
Sodium 241 mg 36 mg Squash, winter, hubbard, cooked, boiled, mashed, with salt has 569% more
Calcium 10 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more
Iron 0.28 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more
Vitamin C 6.5 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more
Potassium 214 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.