Squash, winter, hubbard, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Squash, winter, hubbard, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Squash, winter, hubbard, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 40 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 0% more |
| Carbs | 8.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Squash, winter, hubbard, raw has 233% more |
| Fiber | 3.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Squash, winter, hubbard, raw has 18% more |
| Sugar | 3.95 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 11 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Potassium | 320 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.