Sugars, brown vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sugars, brown
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Sugars, brown | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 380 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sugars, brown has 322% more |
| Protein | 0.12 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Carbs | 98.09 g ★ | 20.71 g | Sugars, brown has 374% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 97.02 g | 6.48 g ★ | Sugars, brown has 1397% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
| Calcium | 83 mg ★ | 38 mg | Sugars, brown has 118% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sugars, brown has 3% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 133 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.