Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Protein | 1.44 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Carbs | 7.24 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Fat | 0.27 g | 0.15 g ★ | Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style has 80% more |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 472 mg | 36 mg ★ | Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style has 1211% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 3.48 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Tomato products, canned, sauce, spanish style has 404% more |
| Vitamin C | 8.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.